Missing Omni
May. 6th, 2013 03:15 pmThe deeper I sink into Sand of Bone revisions, the more trouble I'm having maintaining voice. It's fairly easy in large sections where revisions require a simple rework and rearrangement of what's there. But the places that require a bridge of new material--or an entire new chapter--I am struggling against the omni voice of Chant.
Writing in omni isn't something I expected to so fall in love with. Chant was an experiment, my chance to try out what
sartorias spoke of with such excitement. But as I settled into the flow--developed a better feel for narrative shifts, grew comfortable with choosing whose eyes and ears and mind would be shared with the reader--I indeed fell in love with its dual nature. Omni is at once direct and removed, simple and complicated, rich and streamlined. It's the broad focus of a panorama lens combined with the encompassing intimacy of a gentle kiss.
Now, with Sand, I feel as if I'm learning third all over again, which in some ways I am. There is such a temptation to slip into omni, to re-write the entire thing in omni. But shifting from third to omni isn't a simple thing. The switch would require a complete overhaul of its structure, timing, character revelations, important plot notes... And I don't have a storyteller--the behind-the-prose character telling the story. Based on my experience with Chant, that lack is enough to kill the chances of omni working well.
So, no, Sand will remain third--at least until I reach the end of the rewrite, I suppose. Then I'll beg some beta feedback to see if it works. If not, I shall shelve it, work it on Chant's sequel, and Drunkard, and any other thing I can until I figure out what the heck I want to do with it. Why not do that now? Because I want beyond all wants to have the rewrite finished rather than aborted. (And I'm so glad I get to make that choice. Were I on an external deadline, Sand would never be what I want it to be.)
But the no-omni thing is indeed bugging the crap out of me. I never thought third-person would feel so constricting and clunky!
Writing in omni isn't something I expected to so fall in love with. Chant was an experiment, my chance to try out what
Now, with Sand, I feel as if I'm learning third all over again, which in some ways I am. There is such a temptation to slip into omni, to re-write the entire thing in omni. But shifting from third to omni isn't a simple thing. The switch would require a complete overhaul of its structure, timing, character revelations, important plot notes... And I don't have a storyteller--the behind-the-prose character telling the story. Based on my experience with Chant, that lack is enough to kill the chances of omni working well.
So, no, Sand will remain third--at least until I reach the end of the rewrite, I suppose. Then I'll beg some beta feedback to see if it works. If not, I shall shelve it, work it on Chant's sequel, and Drunkard, and any other thing I can until I figure out what the heck I want to do with it. Why not do that now? Because I want beyond all wants to have the rewrite finished rather than aborted. (And I'm so glad I get to make that choice. Were I on an external deadline, Sand would never be what I want it to be.)
But the no-omni thing is indeed bugging the crap out of me. I never thought third-person would feel so constricting and clunky!
no subject
Date: 2013-05-06 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-05-06 07:28 pm (UTC)I really struggled in the beginning to understand omni until my brain stumbled onto the image of a storyteller at the hearth. The storyteller will take on different tones and voices for characters, but remains the storyteller (as opposed to an actor, who takes on a single character at a time).
no subject
Date: 2013-05-06 07:30 pm (UTC)